Webinar
Tuning Up Your Performance Management Process
Sep 21st, 2010
Webinar
Surviving and Thriving in a Globalized World
Sep 28th, 2010
Conferences
Strategies 2011:
Human Capital Connections, Insight and Inspiration
February 23rd — 25th, 2011
The Ritz-Carlton, Half Moon Bay, Half Moon Bay, California
PLEASE VISIT OUR SPONSORS
Pittsburgh
Female executives who break through the “glass ceiling” in corporate America are rewarded with higher overall compensation than their male counterparts and benefit from the same rate of promotion, according to new research from the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University. However, the study also found that the number of females in top executive positions remains a fraction of business leadership overall, largely due to the tendency of women to leave the workforce earlier than men.
The findings, gleaned from tracking the career paths and compensation of more than 16,000 executives over a 14-year period, identified that female executives actually earn about $100,000 more per year than men of the same age, educational background and job experience.
On average, total compensation for all of the executives — about 5 percent of who were female — was about $2.46 million, including almost $461,000 in salary and bonus. The average age was 53 years old, and approximately 23 percent of the executives studied — men and women — held an MBA.
However, women within the overall sample were, on average, younger and less experienced than males at the executive level and more prevalent at the lower executive levels. For example, just 2 percent of executives at the CEO, president or chairman level were female, while women represented almost 6 percent of CFOs or vice presidents.
“Women aren’t climbing as many rungs on the executive ladder because they are more likely than males to retire earlier or switch careers,” said Robert A. Miller, professor of economics and strategy at the Tepper School and one of the study’s co-authors. “Although women may still be likely to face gender discrimination through unpleasant work environments or tougher, less rewarding, assignments, our results find that there does appear to be equal pay and equal opportunity for women if they stay in the workforce and get to the executive level.”
Miller and his colleagues compiled comprehensive data representing 60 different job titles at more than 1,800 companies between 1992 and 2006 using Standard & Poor’s ExecuComp database and Marquis’ “Who’s Who.” Grouping the executives into seven different ranks based on titles, the study analyzed trends in promotion rates and total compensation — including salary, bonus, stock, options, retirement schemes and other information — for both men and women.
The study indicates that job turnover and tenure as well as education are better overall indicators of compensation rather than gender. In terms of compensation, an executive’s history of career turnover and the presence of an MBA tend to have the greatest impact. In fact, MBA graduates earn about $130,000 more per year than executives with only an undergraduate degree, and $230,000 more than those with just a professional certification.
August 2010
The Planning-Doing Gap
Business experts have written extensively about the promises of strategic plans and their execution failures.
August 2010
The Rules of Engagement
Employees are people, and people want to make a difference.
August 2010
Is Your Training Past Its Sell-By Date?
The wrong talent management strategy could mean the death of a salesman.
August 2010
Checking the Speedometer
General Parts International’s HR department built a new human capital measurement model to gauge store performance and accelerate business.
August 2010
Cornering the Market on Talent
Retail brokerage firm Scottrade emerged from the recession relatively unscathed thanks to a commitment to lean teams and internal development.